11/14/2023 0 Comments Rivers casino pittsburgh chip amounts![]() “The original 12 offenses deemed subject to the mandatory fine all involved conduct that went directly to the integrity of the fledgling industry, an industry that naturally raises concerns about associated criminal activity,” the court wrote.īut in Eisenberg’s case, his was not a theft related to controlling the gaming industry. They included, among others, perjury, failure to pay a licensing fee, unauthorized operation of slot machines and cheating. The state argued that the Legislature’s decision to require a substantial fine in the 2004 Gaming Act is neither irrational nor unreasonable, because the purpose of it is to protect the public by “punishing and deterring criminal behavior that would undermine public confidence in the gaming industry.”Īt the time of its enactment, the Gaming Act delineated 13 criminal acts, 12 of which were subject to a $75,000 mandatory minimum fine for a first offense. He further argued that the fine “makes no measurable contribution to the goals of punishment and that it is irrational and unreasonable.” In his appeal, Eisenberg told the court that the $75,000 fine violates the state Constitution’s prohibition against excessive fines - that it is “grossly disproportionate to the severity of his offense,” and that it should be deemed excessive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |